This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 0146167208315938v1 34/7/924    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Kross, E. Articles by Ayduk, O. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kross, E. Articles by Ayduk, O. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Facilitating Adaptive Emotional Analysis: Distinguishing Distanced-Analysis of Depressive Experiences From Immersed-Analysis and Distraction

¹ Columbia University
² University of California, Berkeley

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ekross{at}psych.columbia.edu.

	Abstract

Two studies examined the psychological processes that facilitate adaptive emotional analysis. In Study 1, participants recalled a depression experience and then analyzed their feelings from either a self-immersed (immersed-analysis) or self-distanced (distanced-analysis) perspective. Participants in the distanced-analysis group focused less on recounting their experience and more on reconstruing it, which in turn led to lower levels of depressed affect. Furthermore, comparisons to a distraction group indicated that distanced-analysis was as effective as distraction in reducing depressed affect relative to the immersed-analysis group. Study 2 replicated these findings and showed that both 1 day and 7 days after the experimental manipulations, participants in the distanced-analysis group remained buffered against depressed affect and reported experiencing fewer recurring thoughts about their depression experience over time compared to both the immersed-analysis and distraction groups.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?