This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 0146167208316690v1 34/7/965    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Poon, C. S. K. Articles by Koehler, D. J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Poon, C. S. K. Articles by Koehler, D. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences

¹ University of Hong Kong
² University of Waterloo

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cskpoon{at}hkucc.hku.hk.

	Abstract

This article tests whether individual differences in inferring one trait from another (intertrait inferences) can be linked to lay beliefs about the malleability of personality (person theories). It finds that holding the belief that personality is malleable (incremental theory) rather than fixed (entity theory) at the time of inferences is associated with less extreme inferences involving semantically related (but not unrelated) traits. Although person theories have been assumed to be stable over time, existing short-term test–retest coefficients do not capture their instability over a longer period. These results can illuminate interrater discrepancies in assessments of personality pathology and job performance, enrich understanding of such phenomena as stereotyping and impression formation, refine the interpretation of past research involving person theories, and inform research planning.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?