This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 0146167208316692v1 34/7/900    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Petty, R. E. Articles by Strathman, A. J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Petty, R. E. Articles by Strathman, A. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Need for Cognition Can Magnify or Attenuate Priming Effects in Social Judgment

¹ The Ohio State University
² Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
³ University of Missouri

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Petty.1{at}osu.edu.

	Abstract

This article hypothesizes that the individual-difference variable, need for cognition (NFC), can have opposite implications for priming effects, depending on prime blatancy. Subtle primes are argued to be more effective for high- versus low-NFC individuals. This is because for high-NFC individuals, (a) constructs are generally easier to activate, (b) their higher amount of thought offers more opportunity for an activated construct to bias judgment, and (c) their thoughtfully formed judgments are more likely to affect behavior. However, because high-NFC individuals are adept at identifying and correcting for bias, with blatant primes the activated construct should be less likely to exert its default influence. Furthermore, with blatant primes, low-NFC individuals may achieve sufficient activation for primes to affect judgment. Across three studies, it is shown that as NFC increases, the magnitude of priming effects increases with a subtle prime but decreases with a blatant prime.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?