This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 0146167208316734v1 34/7/978    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Gregg, A. P. Articles by Kumashiro, M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gregg, A. P. Articles by Kumashiro, M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Everyday Conceptions of Modesty: A Prototype Analysis

¹ University of Southampton
² Goldsmiths College, University of London

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: aiden{at}soton.ac.uk.

	Abstract

Good theoretical definitions of psychological phenomena not only are rigorously formulated but also provide ample conceptual coverage. To assess the latter, we empirically surveyed everyday conceptions of modesty in a combined U.S./U.K. sample. In Study 1, participants freely generated multiple exemplars of modesty that judges subsequently sorted into superordinate categories. Exemplar frequency and priority served, respectively, as primary and secondary indices of category prototypicality that enabled central, peripheral, and marginal clusters to be identified. Follow-up studies then confirmed the ordinal prototypicality of these clusters with the aid of both explicit (Studies 2 and 3) and implicit (Study 3) methodologies. Modest people emerged centrally as humble, shy, solicitous, and not boastful and peripherally as honest, likeable, not arrogant, attention-avoiding, plain, and gracious. Everyday conceptions of modesty also spanned both mind and behavior, emphasized agreeableness and introversion, and predictably incorporated an element of humility.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?