Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riess, M.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Riess, M.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Ego-Involvement and Attributions for Success and Failure in a Field Setting

Marc Riess

Middlebury College

Jim Taylor

University of Colorado

To test directly cognitive and motivational explanations of self-serving biases in the field, 141 male and 116 female alpine ski racers provided attributions for their performance in competitions varying in rank on a 5-level hierarchy developed by the United States Ski Association. This hierarchy, which reflects the importance of races, functioned as a naturally-occurring manipulation of ego-involvement. Results supported the cognitive rather than the motivational explanation of divergent attributions for success versus failure. Racers made more internal attributions (to ability and effort) when they did well rather than poorly, but their ego-involvement in the race had no effects on their attributions. Consistent with previous field research, external attributions (to task difficulty and luck) were not affected by performance outcome.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 10, No. 4, 536-543 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167284104006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. R. Grove, S. J. Hanrahan, and A. McInman
Success/Failure Bias in Attributions Across Involvement Categories in Sport
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1991; 17(1): 93 - 97.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Taylor and M. Riess
"Self-Serving" Attributions to Valenced Causal Factors: A Field Experiment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1989; 15(3): 337 - 348.
[Abstract]