Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devine, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Malpass, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Devine, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Malpass, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 1, 33-40 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167285111003
© 1985 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Orienting Strategies in Differential Face Recognition

Patricia G. Devine

Ohio State University

Roy S. Malpass

State University of New York, Plattsburgh

We examined the hypothesis that differential orienting strategies for own -and other-race faces are responsible for the superiority of own-race over other-race face recognition. White and black subjects viewed both white and blackfaces following inferential or superficial judgement or intentional learning instructions. Experimentally inducing a superficial orienting strategy depressed both own -and other-race recognition scores well below those obtained through both inferential and intentional instructions. Recognition performance under these latter two conditions were equivalent for both black and white subjects. The orienting task manipulation influenced recognition performance, but there was no evidence that it was responsible for the differential recognition effect.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
S. Teitelbaum and R. E. Geiselman
Observer Mood and Cross-Racial Recognition of Faces
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 1997; 28(1): 93 - 106.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
A. D. West and B. J. Long
The Effects of Color on Eyewitness Identification Accuracy: Implications for Criminal Justice
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, December 1, 1993; 9(4): 343 - 360.



Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. Anthony, C. Copper, and B. Mullen
Cross-Racial Facial Identification: A Social Cognitive Integration
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1992; 18(3): 296 - 301.
[Abstract]


Home page
Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
R. S. Malpass
An Excursion Into Utilitarian Analysis
Cross-Cultural Research, January 1, 1990; 24(1-4): 1 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. K. Bothwell, J. C. Brigham, and R. S. Malpass
Cross-Racial Identification
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1989; 15(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract]