|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 1,
41-50 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167285111004
Conformity and Group Size
The Concern with Being Right and the Concern with Being Liked
Chester A. Insko
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Richard H. Smith
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mark D. Alicke
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joel Wade
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sylvester Taylor
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that the group-size effect in an Asch-type conformity experiment is a function of the concern with being right and the concern with being liked. In addition to a manipulation of group size, there were manipulations of manner of responding (public or private) and of the nature of the judgments (objectively determined or undetermined). Consistent with expectations, each of the latter two variables interacted with group size. There was also a significant main effect for group size, and a significant deviation from control indicating that conformity occurs with private judgments relating to objective stimuli.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Cohen, R. M. Montoya, and C. A. Insko
Group morality and intergroup relations: cross-cultural and experimental evidence.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
November 1, 2006;
32(11):
1559 - 1572.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Hodges and A. L. Geyer
A Nonconformist Account of the Asch Experiments: Values, Pragmatics, and Moral Dilemmas
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2006;
10(1):
2 - 19.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Bond
Group Size and Conformity
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 2005;
8(4):
331 - 354.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Kaplan and A. M. Martin
Effects of Differential Status of Group Members on Process and Outcome of Deliberation
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 1999;
2(4):
347 - 364.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Lipkus and C. Rusbult
Reactions to Individuals Who Are Consistently Positive or Negative: The Impact of Differing Interaction Goals
Human Relations,
April 1, 1993;
46(4):
481 - 499.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. MacKie, M. C. Gastardo-Conaco, and J. J. Skelly
Knowledge of the Advocated Position and the Processing of In-Group and Out-Group Persuasive Messages
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
April 1, 1992;
18(2):
145 - 151.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|