Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borys, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perlman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Borys, S.
Right arrow Articles by Perlman, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 1, 63-74 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167285111006

Gender Differences in Loneliness

Shelley Borys

University of Waterloo

Daniel Perlman

University of British Columbia

Earlier studies on gender differences in loneliness appear to have produced contradictory results. However, when 39 existing data sets were classified according to whether they used the UCLA scale (N = 28) or a self-labeling measure (N = II) of loneliness, the results revealed a clear pattern. Statistically significant sex differences are not usually found with the UCLA scale, but, when they are found, males typically have higher loneliness scores. In terms of self-labeling, women more frequently than men admit being lonely. Sex role factors may help explain these seemingly contradictory results. Of the various possible explanations of the gender differences in self-labeled loneliness, most assume that social influence processes play a crucial role. To test this viewpoint, an experiment was conducted. Subjects (N = 117) were presented with a case history of a lonely person, which varied only the target person's sex. The subjects were more rejecting of a lonely male than of a lonely female. These results support the view that women are more apt to acknowledge their loneliness than men because the negative consequences of admitting loneliness are less for women.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Studies in International EducationHome page
E. Sawir, S. Marginson, A. Deumert, C. Nyland, and G. Ramia
Loneliness and International Students: An Australian Study
Journal of Studies in International Education, June 1, 2008; 12(2): 148 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
J. D. J. Gierveld and T. V. Tilburg
A 6-Item Scale for Overall, Emotional, and Social Loneliness: Confirmatory Tests on Survey Data
Research on Aging, September 1, 2006; 28(5): 582 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
M. Pinquart and S. Sorensen
Gender Differences in Self-Concept and Psychological Well-Being in Old Age: A Meta-Analysis
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., July 1, 2001; 56(4): P195 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. R. Green, D. S. Richardson, T. Lago, and E. C. Schatten-Jones
Network Correlates of Social and Emotional Loneliness in Young and Older Adults
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2001; 27(3): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
K. J. Rotenberg
Stigmatization of Transitions in Loneliness
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 1998; 15(4): 565 - 576.
[Abstract]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
L. C. Mullins and M. Mushel
The Existence and Emotional Closeness of Relationships with Children, Friends, and Spouses: The Effect on Loneliness among Older Persons
Research on Aging, December 1, 1992; 14(4): 448 - 470.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. Tornstam
Loneliness in Marriage
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, May 1, 1992; 9(2): 197 - 217.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
K. J. Rotenberg and J. Kmill
Perception of Lonely and Non-Lonely Persons as a Function of Individual Differences in Loneliness
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, May 1, 1992; 9(2): 325 - 330.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Lau and G. E. Gruen
The Social Stigma of Loneliness: Effect of Target Person's and Perceiver's Sex
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1992; 18(2): 182 - 189.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
J. H. Berg and R. D. McQuinn
Loneliness and Aspects of Social Support Networks
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 1989; 6(3): 359 - 372.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
C. Marangoni and W. Ickes
Loneliness: A Theoretical Review with Implications for Measurement
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 1989; 6(1): 93 - 128.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. D. Newcomb and P. M. Bentler
Loneliness and Social Support: A Confirmatory Hierarchical Analysis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1986; 12(4): 520 - 535.
[Abstract]