This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steffen, V. J. Articles by Eagly, A. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Steffen, V. J. Articles by Eagly, A. H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Implicit Theories about Influence Style

The Effects of Status and Sex

Purdue University

Alice H. Eagly

Purdue University

This experiment explored people's implicit theories about the effects of influencers' and targets' status and sex on the directness and politeness of influencers' persuasive style. Female and male subjects read a description of either a woman influencing a man or a man influencing a woman. Either the influencer's job title was high in status and the target's was low, the influencer's title was low in status and the target's was high, or neither person had a job title. For each of four request styles that varied in directness and politeness, subjects rated the likelihood that the influencer would (1) use the style; (2) gain compliance by using the style; and (3) be liked by the target after using the style. As predicted, high-status influencers were considered more likely to use direct and impolite styles and less likely to use indirect and polite styles than low status influencers. As a consequence of using direct and impolite styles, high status influencers were thought more likely to gain compliance and liking than low-status influencers. The sex of the influencer and target had little effect on subjects' implicit theories of influence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. B. Whaley and L. S. Wagner Rebuttal Analogy in Persuasive Messages: Communicator Likability and Cognitive Responses Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2000; 19(1): 66 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. R. Offermann and C. T. Kearney Supervisor Sex and Subordinate Influence Strategies Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1988; 14(2): 360 - 367. [Abstract]