Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cash, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cash, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 3, 246-257 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167285113002
© 1985 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Not Just Another Pretty Face

Sex Roles, Locus of Control and Cosmetics Use

Thomas F. Cash

Old Dominion University

John Rissi

Old Dominion University

Rees Chapman

Old Dominion University

Despite the voluminous literature on the physical attractiveness variable, little research has considered the psychosocial processes involved in self alterations of appearance (i.e., grooming behavior). The present study examined individual differences in a largely sex-specific facet of grooming, facial cosmetics use among women. Seventy-five female college students completed the Cash Cosmetics Use Inventory, which assesses the quantity and the situational-dispositional pattern of cosmetics use. Subjects completed personality measures of sex-role identity, sex-role attitudes, social self-esteem, and locus of control. Higher-quantity users were found to be more sex-typed on bipolar but not unipolar sex-role identity, somewhat more profeminist in attitudes, and less external in locus of control for achievement success. Women who were more situationally variable in their pattern of use did not differ in sex-role identity but were more liberal in sex-role attitudes and more internal vis-a-vis affiliative outcomes. These results are discussed in the context of sex-role theory, impression management, and new directions for a psychology of physical appearance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
S. J. Lennon and N. A. Rudd
Linkages between Attitudes toward Gender Roles, Body Satisfaction, Self-Esteem, and Appearance Management Behaviors in Women
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, December 1, 1994; 23(2): 94 - 117.
[Abstract]


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
J. E. Workman and K. K. P. Johnson
The Role of Cosmetics in Impression Formation
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, September 1, 1991; 10(1): 63 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
B. K. Jones
The Gender Difference Hypothesis: A Synthesis of Research Findings
Educational Administration Quarterly, February 1, 1990; 26(1): 5 - 37.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. S. Friedman, R. E. Riggio, and D. F. Casella
Nonverbal Skill, Personal Charisma, and Initial Attraction
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1988; 14(1): 203 - 211.
[Abstract]