Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 1, 51-62 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167286121006

The Knowledge of What Might have Been

Affective and Attributional Consequences of Near Outcomes

Joel T. Johnson

University of California, Davis

This study examined certain affective and attributional consequences of outcomes and "near outcomes"in the lives of target individuals. A total of 121 subjects read versions of scenarios that systematically differed in the valence of a major life outcome and whether the outcome actually or only nearly happened (the "near outcome"). Results generally indicated that near outcomes as well as actual out-comes had significant impact on the perceived affective consequences of the situation, and that near outcomes also affected trait inferences and predictions regarding the target person. Differences between the perceived affective consequences of positive near outcomes and negative near outcomes were generally a function of differences in the valence of the near outcomes rather than of differences in objective circumstances. Other results also reflected a derogation of the "near winner." The personalities of individuals who narrowly missed experiencing a positive event were rated more negatively; they also were judged as less likely to be successful and less likely to feel positively about their lives in the future. These results are discussed in terms of the suggestions of Kahneman and Tversky (1982) that individuals who learn of a near outcome may simulate its actual occurrence, and that the "simulation heuristic "may shape both inferences and affective states.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. D. Alicke, J. Buckingham, E. Zell, and T. Davis
Culpable Control and Counterfactual Reasoning in the Psychology of Blame
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2008; 34(10): 1371 - 1381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
E. M. Wong
Narrating near-histories: The effects of counterfactual communication on motivation and performance
Management & Organizational History, November 1, 2007; 2(4): 351 - 370.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
O. E. Tykocinski
I Never Had a Chance: Using Hindsight Tactics to Mitigate Disappointments
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2001; 27(3): 376 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. D. Markman and P. E. Tetlock
Accountability and Close-Call Counterfactuals: The Loser Who Nearly Won and the Winner Who Nearly Lost
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(10): 1213 - 1224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. B. Pham and S. E. Taylor
From Thought to Action: Effects of Process-Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1999; 25(2): 250 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Sanna
Self-Efficacy and Counterfactual Thinking: Up a Creek with and without a Paddle
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1997; 23(6): 654 - 666.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Sanna and K. J. Turley
Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1996; 22(9): 906 - 919.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. D. Markman, I. Gavanski, S. J. Sherman, and M. N. McMullen
The Impact of Perceived Control on the Imagination of Better and Worse Possible Worlds
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1995; 21(6): 588 - 595.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. J. Roese and J. M. Olson
Outcome Controllability and Counterfactual Thinking
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1995; 21(6): 620 - 628.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. J. Roese and J. M. Olson
The Structure of Counterfactual Thought
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1993; 19(3): 312 - 319.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. N. MacRae
A Tale of Two Curries: Counterfactual Thinking and Accident-Related Judgments
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1992; 18(1): 84 - 87.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Landman
Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction: Affective Responses to Positive Versus Negative Outcomes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1987; 13(4): 524 - 536.
[Abstract]