Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dugan, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dugan, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 1, 81-89 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167286121009

Trait Distinctiveness and Accessibility in the Self-Schema

John H. Mueller

University of Missouri, Columbia

W. Burt Thompson

University of Missouri, Columbia

Kenneth Dugan

University of Missouri, Columbia

The distinctiveness of trait adjectives as self-descriptors was assessed in two ways. One method focused on how many people the trait described (self only, or self and others), whereas the other focused on how much it describes the self When distinctiveness is defined in terms of how many people the trait characterizes, distinctive traits yield slower self-reference decisions than common traits, regardless of degree of descriptiveness. On the other hand, when distinctiveness is defined as degree of descriptiveness, an inverted-U function results, with traits at either extreme of descriptiveness yielding faster decisions than those of intermediate descriptiveness. The results indicate these alternative definitions assess different aspects of distinctiveness, and conclusions drawn from one assessment may not apply to the other.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. Meliema and J. N. Bassili
On the Relationship between Attitudes and Values: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Self-Monitoring and Self-Monitoring Schematicity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1995; 21(9): 885 - 892.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. B. Klein, J. Loftus, and J. W. Sherman
The Role of Summary and Specific Behavioral Memories in Trait Judgments about the Self
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1993; 19(3): 305 - 311.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. W. Perdue and M. B. Gurtman
Self-Reference and Evaluative Biases in the Perception of Trait Information
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1988; 14(3): 578 - 586.
[Abstract]