Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prager, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prager, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 1, 91-109 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167286121010

Intimacy Status

Its Relationship to Locus of Control, Self-Disclosure, and Anxiety in Adults

Karen J. Prager

University of Texas at Dallas

The purpose of these studies was to determine whether individuals who have afully developed capacity for intimacy, as assessed by an intimacy status interview and rating, could be distinguished from those with lesser capacities based on their locus of control orientation, self-disclosure, and anxiety levels. Study I indicated that women high in depth and commitment in their romantic relationships were more internally orientated than those low in either depth or commitment. A finding of no group differences in self-disclosure was thought to be due to the absence of a specified target for the disclosure. In study 2 target persons were specified. It was found that those with high levels of intimacy development had disclosed more about themselves to their romantic partners than those lower in intimacy development and that highly intimate individuals disclosed more to significant others than to casual acquaintances, whereas less intimate participants did not disclose differentially when communicating to different recipients. It was concluded that highly intimate individuals differ from the less intimate not in their overall self-disclosure levels, but rather in their capacity to be selectively self-revealing with their most significant others. Finally, highly intimate participants reported lower levels of global anxiety than did less intimate participants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. S. Hodgins, R. Koestner, and N. Duncan
On the Compatibility of Autonomy and Relatedness
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1996; 22(3): 227 - 237.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
K. J. Prager
Intimacy Status and Couple Conflict Resolution
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1991; 8(4): 505 - 526.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
K. J. Prager
Intimacy Status and Couple Communication
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1989; 6(4): 435 - 449.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
W. E. Snell Jr.
Willingness to Self-Disclose to Female and Male Friends as a Function of Social Anxiety and Gender
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1989; 15(1): 113 - 125.
[Abstract]