Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindskold, S.
Right arrow Articles by Betz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lindskold, S.
Right arrow Articles by Betz, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 2, 179-186 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167286122004

The Essential Elements of Communication in the GRIT Strategy

Svenn Lindskold

Ohio University

Gyuseog Han

Ohio University

Brian Betz

Ohio University

Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the components of the GRIT strategy for promoting cooperation in mixed-motive conflict. A modified Prisoner's Dilemma game was used. In the first experiment, the presence or absence of an opening general announcement of intention was crossed, in a 2 by 2 design, with the presence or absence of specific announcements of individual acts. The results indicated that the general announcement was both necessary and sufficient, whereas the specific messages were ineffective. In the second experiment, the results indicated that subjects responded more cooperatively to the conciliatory initiatives of the simulated other when the general announcement included an invitation to work together toward a common objective. The effect was not considered strong, however. The GRIT recommendations to include specific announcements of individual acts and an invitation to join in conciliation may have greater usefulness in more complex social interactions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
J. K. Butler Jr.
Behaviors, Trust, and Goal Achievement in a Win-Win Negotiating Role Play
Group Organization Management, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 486 - 501.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
B. Betz
Response to Strategy and Communication in an Arms Race-Disarmament Dilemma
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1991; 35(4): 678 - 690.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. A. Wall Jr. and M. W. Blum
Negotiations
Journal of Management, June 1, 1991; 17(2): 273 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Lindskold and G. Han
GRIT as a Foundation for Integrative Bargaining
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1988; 14(2): 335 - 345.
[Abstract]