Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoeneman, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cheek, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schoeneman, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cheek, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Expectancy, Outcome, and Event Type

Effects on Retrospective Reports of Attributional Activity

Thomas J. Schoeneman

Lewis and Clark College

Collin van Uchelen

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Sandra Stonebrink

Rosemont School, Portland

Paul R. Cheek

Lewis and Clark College

We examined the effects of event type (academic or interpersonal), expectancy (expected or unexpected), and outcome (success or failure) on attributional activity in reports of past incidents. After writing about one of the eight incident types, undergraduates disclosed the questions they asked themselves after the incident, gave an attribution, and rated the attribution on the Causal Dimension Scale. Outcome was the only significant predictor of attributional search: Subjects asked more attribution questions for failures than for successes. Compared to failures, successes generated attributions that were more internal, stable, and controllable; attributions for expected events were more stable and controllable than for unexpected events, but the stability effect held only for academic events. The most frequent attribution type was internal-unstable-controllable, especially for failures. For successes, internal-controllable attributions predominated and were about evenly split between stable and unstable causes. These findings suggest the existence of an attributional tendency of personal changeability of causes.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 3, 353-362 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167286123010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Kanazawa
Outcome or Expectancy? Antecedent of Spontaneous Causal Attribution
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1992; 18(6): 659 - 668.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. Fischer, T. J. Schoeneman, and D. E. Rubanowitz
Attributions in the Advice Columns: II. The Dimensionality of Actors' and Observers' Explanations for Interpersonal Problems
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1987; 13(4): 458 - 466.
[Abstract]