| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Expectancy, Outcome, and Event TypeEffects on Retrospective Reports of Attributional ActivityLewis and Clark College
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Rosemont School, Portland
Lewis and Clark College We examined the effects of event type (academic or interpersonal), expectancy (expected or unexpected), and outcome (success or failure) on attributional activity in reports of past incidents. After writing about one of the eight incident types, undergraduates disclosed the questions they asked themselves after the incident, gave an attribution, and rated the attribution on the Causal Dimension Scale. Outcome was the only significant predictor of attributional search: Subjects asked more attribution questions for failures than for successes. Compared to failures, successes generated attributions that were more internal, stable, and controllable; attributions for expected events were more stable and controllable than for unexpected events, but the stability effect held only for academic events. The most frequent attribution type was internal-unstable-controllable, especially for failures. For successes, internal-controllable attributions predominated and were about evenly split between stable and unstable causes. These findings suggest the existence of an attributional tendency of personal changeability of causes.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 3,
353-362 (1986) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
