Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evidence for the Effectiveness of Manipulations of Communal and Exchange Relationships

Margaret S. Clark

Carnegie-Mellon University

This study examined the effectiveness of manipulations of desire for communal and exchange relationships that have been used in several studies. In these past studies, to create desire for communal relationships subjects have been exposed to an attractive target person who, they discover, is single, new at the university, and anxious to meet new people. To create desire for exchange relationships subjects have been exposed to the same attractive target who, they discover, is married and has been at the university for two years. In the present study, half of the subjects were exposed to the communal manipulation and half to the exchange manipulation. In addition, to examine whether the effectiveness of the manipulations depends upon the confederate being physically attractive, half the subjects were exposed to an attractive and half to an unattractive target. Following these manipulations subjects' desire to follow communal and exchange norms in their relationship with the other was measured. The results supported the effectiveness of the relationship manipulations and demonstrated their impact does not depend upon the confederate being attractive. Attractiveness did have a marginally significant main effect such that high attractiveness created greater preference for following communal relative to exchange norms.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 4, 414-425 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167286124004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. M. Williamson, M. S. Clark, L. J. Pegalis, and A. Behan
Affective Consequences of Refusing to Help in Communal and Exchange Relationships
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 1996; 22(1): 34 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. M. Williamson and M. S. Clark
Impact of Desired Relationship Type on Affective Reactions to Choosing and Being Required to Help
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1992; 18(1): 10 - 18.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
C. J. Pilkington, A. Tesser, and D. Stephens
Complementarity in Romantic Relationships: A Self-Evaluation Maintenance Perspective
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1991; 8(4): 481 - 504.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. Shea, L. Thompson, and R. Blieszner
Resources in Older Adults' Old and New Friendships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 1988; 5(1): 83 - 96.
[Abstract]