This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Newcomb, M. D. Articles by Bentler, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Newcomb, M. D. Articles by Bentler, P. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Loneliness and Social Support

A Confirmatory Hierarchical Analysis

University of California, Los Angeles

Peter M. Bentler

University of California, Los Angeles

Important research literatures have grown independently around the study of loneliness and social support. However, it is not clear whether these constructs are empirically or conceptually different. In this study, data from 739 young adults are used to examine the factor structure of two sets of loneliness scales and two sets of social support measures. Results indicated that four substantive factors related to the original scales and two support-specific factors accounted for the variation in 14 loneliness and social support variables. The substantive factors representing the Differential Loneliness Scale, the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Socially Supportive Relationships, and Social Resources were all highly intercorrelated, but significantly less than 1.0. A second-order factor was fit to the four substantive factors and found to be an acceptable representation of their intercorrelations. The support-specific factors were negatively correlated, indicating that Family-Specific Support was inversely associated with Peer-Specific Support. The separate measures of loneliness and social support were found to be endpoints of a higher-order construct of Attachment to Social Network. Thus, although loneliness and social support may be conceptually distinct among lower-order factors, they can be construed as generated by a higher-order construct of general social attachment.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 4, 520-535 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167286124015


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. F. Locke and M. D. Newcomb Psychosocial Predictors and Correlates of Suicidality in Teenage Latino Males Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 2005; 27(3): 319 - 336. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. P. Gallagher and M. Truglio-Londrigan Community Support: Older Adults' Perceptions Clin Nurs Res, February 1, 2004; 13(1): 3 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. CROSNOE, K. G. ERICKSON, and S. M. DORNBUSCH Protective Functions of Family Relationships and School Factors on the Deviant Behavior of Adolescent Boys and Girls: Reducing the Impact of Risky Friendships Youth Society, June 1, 2002; 33(4): 515 - 544. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Bentler and J. Stein Structural equation models in medical research Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 1992; 1(2): 159 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Felix-Ortiz and M. D. Newcomb Risk and Protective Factors for Drug Use among Latino and White Adolescents Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 1992; 14(3): 291 - 309. [Abstract]

				M. D. Newcomb Social Support by Many Other Names: Towards a Unified Conceptualization Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, November 1, 1990; 7(4): 479 - 494. [Abstract]

				C. Marangoni and W. Ickes Loneliness: A Theoretical Review with Implications for Measurement Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 1989; 6(1): 93 - 128. [Abstract]