Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welton, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pruitt, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Welton, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pruitt, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 1, 123-133 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167287131012
© 1987 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Mediation Process

The Effects of Mediator Bias and Disputant Power

Gary L. Welton

State University of New York at Buffalo

Dean G. Pruitt

State University of New York at Buffalo

This study examined the impact of mediator bias and disputant power over the mediator on acceptance of the mediator and mediator influence. Disputants who perceived the mediator as biased against their side were less accepting of the mediator and less influenced by the mediator than disputants who perceived the mediator as neutral. Disputants with high power over the mediator were more accepting of the mediator but tended to be less influenced by the mediator than disputants with low power. Disputants with high power also used less contentious tactics and reported that they were less concerned about appearing strong to the mediator than disputants with low power. 7here were no interactions between mediator bias and disputant power.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. Arad and P. J. Carnevale
Partisanship Effects in Judgments of Fairness and Trust in Third Parties in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
Journal of Conflict Resolution, September 1, 1994; 38(3): 423 - 451.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. A. Wall Jr. and A. Lynn
Mediation: A Current Review
Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1993; 37(1): 160 - 194.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. M. Wittmer, P. Carnevale, and M. E. Walker
General Alignment and Overt Support in Biased Mediation
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1991; 35(4): 594 - 610.
[Abstract]