Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chin, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chin, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 1, 5-17 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167287131001

Stress-Moderating Effects

Social Support in the Context of Gender and Locus of Control

Robert A. Caldwell

Michigan State University

Jane L. Pearson

Michigan State University

Raymond J. Chin

Michigan State University

Using multiple regression, the main and interactive effects of stress, social support, locus of control, and gender on psychological adjustment were investigated. In order to understand the complex interactions found, the adjustment effects of stress and social support were examined within four subgroups: internal and external men and women college students. Both social support and adjustment were assessed with multiple measures. Stress was more strongly related to levels of adjustment for women than for men. The relationships between social support and adjustment varied depending on which social support measure was used, which adjustment measure was used, as well as the locus of control orientation and gender of the subject. External men were the least able to use social support to aid adjustment. In contrast to previous investigations, there were no two-way stress X locus of control interactions. The importance of investigating the interactions of stress-moderating variables in specific subgroups is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. S. Vogt, S. L. Rizvi, J. C. Shipherd, and P. A. Resick
Longitudinal Investigation of Reciprocal Relationship Between Stress Reactions and Hardiness
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 61 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A Skrabski, M Kopp, and I Kawachi
Social capital in a changing society: cross sectional associations with middle aged female and male mortality rates
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, February 1, 2003; 57(2): 114 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
G. F. Koeske and R. D. Koeske
Underestimation of Social Support Buffering
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1991; 27(4): 475 - 489.
[Abstract] [PDF]