Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 2, 156-165 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167287132002
© 1987 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Social Identity and Social Distance among Hong Kong Schoolchildren

Marilynn B. Brewer

University of California, Los Angeles

Hing-Kay Ho

University of Southern California

Ju-Young Lee

University of Southern California

Norman Miller

University of Southern California

In a study conducted in two Hong Kong schools, two measures of social distance were obtained with respect to descriptions of eight target children who varied systematically in sex and ethnic identity. Results on both measures clearly supported a hierarchical model of category combination in that discriminations among targets based on one category distinction were greater when the targets were members of the respondent's ingroup on the other category dimension than when they were outgroup members. The pattern of categorization effects differed, however, depending on which measure of social distance was used. For a scale of desired intimacy of interaction, target sex appeared to be the primary categorization, with ethnicity effects subordinate to gender. For a measure of perceived similarity to self, the dominance pattern was reversed, with gender effects subordinate to ethnicity. Responsiveness to target sex was not affected by whether children attended a coeducational or sex-segregated school.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. J. Crisp, J. Walsh, and M. Hewstone
Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2006; 32(9): 1204 - 1218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
B. Park and C. M. Judd
Rethinking the Link Between Categorization and Prejudice Within the Social Cognition Perspective
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2005; 9(2): 108 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
N. Ensari, J. B. Kenworthy, L. Urban, C. J. Canales, E. Vasquez, D. Kim, and N. Miller
Negative Affect and Political Sensitivity in Crossed Categorization: Self-Reports versus EMG
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2004; 7(1): 55 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. Lipponen, K. Helkama, and M. Juslin
Subgroup Identification, Superordinate Identification and Intergroup Bias between the Subgroups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2003; 6(3): 239 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
S. Roccas and M. B. Brewer
Social Identity Complexity
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2002; 6(2): 88 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. J. Crisp, M. Hewstone, and M. Rubin
Does Multiple Categorization Reduce Intergroup Bias?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, January 1, 2001; 27(1): 76 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. P. van Oudenhoven, C. M. Judd, and M. Hewstone
Additive and Interactive Models of Crossed Categorization in Correlated Social Categories
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2000; 3(3): 285 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. J. Crisp and M. Hewstone
Differential Evaluation of Crossed Category Groups: Patterns, Processes, and Reducing Intergroup Bias
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 1999; 2(4): 307 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. A. Bettencourt and N. Dorr
Cooperative Interaction and Intergroup Bias: Effects of Numerical Representation and Cross-Cut Role Assignment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1998; 24(12): 1276 - 1293.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Singh, W. M. Choo, and L. L. Poh
In-Group Bias and Fair-Mindedness as Strategies of Self-Presentation in Intergroup Perception
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1998; 24(2): 147 - 162.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. F. Dovidio, S. L. Gaertner, A. M. Isen, and R. Lowrance
Group Representations and Intergroup Bias: Positive Affect, Similarity, and Group Size
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1995; 21(8): 856 - 865.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Eurich-Fulcer and J. W. Schofield
Correlated Versus Uncorrelated Social Categorizations: The Effect on Intergroup Bias
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1995; 21(2): 149 - 159.
[Abstract]