Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DePaulo, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DePaulo, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, J. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 2, 177-187 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167287132004
© 1987 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Physical Attractiveness and Skill at Detecting Deception

Bella M. DePaulo

University of Virginia

John Tang

University of Virginia

Julie I. Stone

Arbor, Inc.

Are physically attractive people more skilled than unattractive people at distinguishing truth from deception? To address this question, we showed videotapes of truthful and deceptive messages to 102 males and females classified as low, medium, or high in attractiveness. The speakers shown on the tapes were telling truths and lies to attractive or unattractive listeners of the same or opposite sex. The lies that the speakers told to attractive listeners were generally easier to detect than were the lies that they told to unattractive listeners. The lies told to attractive listeners were even more accurately identified by subjects who were themselves of average or high attractiveness (as defined by the ratings made by their peers) than by those who were unattractive. Conversely, the lies told to unattractive listeners were relatively more accurately detected by subjects who were unattractive than by those who were moderately attractive or very attractive. These findings are consistent with a skill-specificity formulation. The role of practice and experience in the development of skill at detecting deception is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
W. C. Rowatt, M. R. Cunningham, and P. B. Druen
Lying to Get a Date: The Effect of Facial Physical Attractiveness on the Willingness to Deceive Prospective Dating Partners
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 1999; 16(2): 209 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. F. Keating and K. R. Heltman
Dominance and Deception in Children and Adults: Are Leaders the Best Misleaders?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1994; 20(3): 312 - 321.
[Abstract]