Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, L. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 4, 437-447 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167287134001
© 1987 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Perceived Behavioral Consistency Underlying Trait Attributions to Oneself and Another

An Extension of the Actor-Observer Effect

Terri L. Baxter

University of Oregon and Oregon Research Institute

Lewis R. Goldberg

University of Oregon and Oregon Research Institute

This psychometric study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that people perceive themselves as more variable than others, even when they judge themselves and the other person identically on a trait-rating scale. Using one of two different types of rating formats, subjects described themselves and a person of the same sex and approximate age whom they knew well and liked. Both persons were rated on each of6O trait-descriptive adjectives, with a scale ranging from -3 to +3, plus four middle response options (average, depends on the situation, don't know, term unclear). After each of their trait ratings, subjects assessed the consistency of the person's behaviors associated with that trait. Analyses revealed a highly uniform pattern of self/other differences in the predicted direction: For 72% of the 60 traits, the majority of the subjects described themselves as more variable than the other person.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Krueger
Enhancement Bias in Descriptions of Self and Others
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1998; 24(5): 505 - 516.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. S. Shrauger, D. Ram, S. A. Greninger, and E. Mariano
Accuracy of Self-Predictions Versus Judgments by Knowledgeable Others
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1996; 22(12): 1229 - 1243.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
Y. Shoda and W. Mischel
Cognitive Social Approach to Dispositional Inferences: What if the Perceiver is a Cognitive Social Theorist?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1993; 19(5): 574 - 585.
[Abstract]