Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SPSP Annual Meeting 2010

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindskold, S.
Right arrow Articles by Han, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lindskold, S.
Right arrow Articles by Han, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

GRIT as a Foundation for Integrative Bargaining

Svenn Lindskold

Ohio University

Gyuseog Han

Ohio University

Sixty male subjects first engaged in a Prisoner's Dilemma interaction with a simulated other who either followed a conciliatory strategy (GRIT), a competitive strategy, or a no-message control strategy. They then participated in an integrative bargaining task in which the optimal agreement required logrolling over three commodities. As hypothesized, the subjects in the GRIT condition differed from the others in terms of number arriving at the optimal agreement, their level of aspiration as bargaining opened, and in the content of their communications. The GRIT subjects differed from the competitive subjects on post experimental ratings of the other person and of their objectives on the bargaining task. The results are discussed in terms of conciliation on one task laying the foundation for high aspirations and effective interaction in later integrative bargaining.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 2, 335-345 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167288142011
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
H. H. Blumberg
On Taking too Much: A Point Accumulation Procedure for Comparing Mutual Agreements with Controlled Individual Initiatives
Small Group Research, May 1, 1997; 28(2): 171 - 193.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
B. Betz
Response to Strategy and Communication in an Arms Race-Disarmament Dilemma
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1991; 35(4): 678 - 690.
[Abstract]