Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Attribution-Affect-Action Theory of Behavior

Replications of Judgments of Help-Giving

Greg Schmidt

University of California, Los Angeles

Bernard Weiner

University of California, Los Angeles

Four self-contained experimental conditions (N = 496) examined the relations between perceived controllability, emotional reactions of anger and sympathy, and judgments of helping behavior. In accordance with prior findings, it was confirmed that an attribution-affect-action path captures the motivational process in this domain. Controllable causes of a need state give rise to anger, which, in turn, evokes neglect, whereas uncontrollable causes of a need state elicit pity, which, in turn, generates judgments of help-giving. These paths were not altered by self-focus and other-focus (empathy) instructions or by instructions to ignore feelings and concentrate on the objective situation. General issues pertaining to helping and affect were examined.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 3, 610-621 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167288143021
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
P. W. Corrigan, A. Green, R. Lundin, M. A. Kubiak, and D. L. Penn
Familiarity With and Social Distance From People Who Have Serious Mental Illness
Psychiatr Serv, July 1, 2001; 52(7): 953 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
S. M. JONES and B. R. BURLESON
The Impact of Situational Variables on Helpers' Perceptions of Comforting Messages: An Attributional Analysis
Communication Research, October 1, 1997; 24(5): 530 - 555.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. Betancourt and I. Blair
A Cognition (Attribution)-Emotion Model of Violence in Conflict Situations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1992; 18(3): 343 - 350.
[Abstract]