Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bramwell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wright, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bramwell, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 3, 630-640 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167288143023

Difficulty and Effectiveness of Avoidance Behavior as Determinants of Evaluations of a Potential Aversive Outcome

Rex A. Wright

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Cathy L. Kelley

University of Maryland at College Park

Allen Bramwell

University of Washington

Subjects expected to perform an easy or moderately difficult memory task with the opportunity to earn a high or low chance of avoiding an aversive reading exercise if they succeeded. As predicted on the basis of a recent theory of motivation, ratings of how aversive the reading exercise would be were higher for subjects assigned the difficult memory task than for subjects assigned the easy memory task when the chance of avoidance was high, but were relatively low in both task conditions when the chance of avoidance was low.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
P. M. Biner, D. M. Hua, H. J. Kidd, and P. M. Spencer
Incentive Strength, Need State, Instrumental Task Difficulty, and the Magnitude of Goal Valence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1991; 17(4): 442 - 448.
[Abstract]