Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bisanz, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rule, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bisanz, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rule, B. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 1, 4-18 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167289151001

Gender and the Persuasion Schema

A Search for Cognitive Invariants

Gay L. Bisanz

University of Alberta

Brendan Gail Rule

University of Alberta

This study extends work by Rule, Bisanz, and Kohn (1985) designed to characterize the nature of a persuasion schema. Men and women were given (a) descriptions of situations in which either a man or a woman was attempting to influence a friend or father to achieve various goals and (b) a list of methods identified as being elements of the persuasion schema. Participants rank ordered methods in terms of probable sequence of use by others for these goals and targets. They also rated each method with respect to its social acceptability and the likelihood that they themselves would use it. For all situations described, the sequence of strategy use reported for other people was similar for men and women. In addition, the data on participants' likely use of methods provided evidence that men's and women's expectations about the order in which they themselves would use persuasion strategies are similar. Finally, degree of social approval was related to the sequence of strategy use anticipated for both others and oneself.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
K. Kellermann
A Goal-Directed Approach to Gaining Compliance: Relating Differences Among Goals to Differences in Behaviors
Communication Research, August 1, 2004; 31(4): 397 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
A. N. Shelby and N. L. Reinsch Jr.
Writing in Noninterpersonal Settings: Rhetorical Choices by Nonprofessional Writers in Letters to a Senator
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 50 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
R. M. Butterfield and M. A. Lewis
Health-Related Social Influence: A Social Ecological Perspective on Tactic Use
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 2002; 19(4): 505 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]