Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 1, 52-60 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167289151005

The Role of Ambiguity and Gender in Mediating the Effects of Salient Cognitions

James D. Johnson

University of North Carolina at Wilmington

Lee A. Jackson

University of North Carolina at Wilmington

Garry J. Smith

University of North Carolina at Wilmington

The purpose of the present research was to assess the effects of the simultaneous occurrence of two potential moderators of the perceptual-biasing effects of salient cognitions. These moderating factors were ambiguity of the behavioral information and individual differences (gender). The design was a 2 (salience-salient, nonsalient) X 2 (ambiguity-ambiguous, relatively unambiguous) X 2 gender (male, female) factorial. One-half of the subjects were exposed to information focusing on the inappropriateness of sexual inequality (salient condition), whereas the other half were not exposed to such information (nonsalient condition). Subsequently, subjects read a passage that depicted an acquaintance rape in which the female clearly (relatively unambiguous condition) or did not clearly (ambiguous condition) convey her lack of consent to intercourse. The results indicated that salience had minimal effects in the relatively unambiguous condition. In the ambiguous condition, the effects of salience were moderated by gender. Implications for research focusing on moderators of salient stimuli and modification of negative perceptions of rape were discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. D. Johnson, C. Simmons, S. Trawalter, T. Ferguson, and W. Reed
Variation in Black Anti-White Bias and Target Distancing Cues: Factors that Influence Perceptions of "Ambiguously Racist" Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2003; 29(5): 609 - 622.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. D. Johnson, E. Whitestone, L. A. Jackson, and L. Gatto
Justice is Still Not Colorblind: Differential Racial Effects of Exposure to Inadmissible Evidence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1995; 21(9): 893 - 898.
[Abstract]