This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bassili, J. N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bassili, J. N. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Trait Encoding in Behavior Identification and Dispositional Inference

University of Toronto, Scarborough Campus

Subjects were presented with behavioral vignettes that either suggested traits in the actors or suggested that the behavior was caused by the situation. A word-fragment completion procedure was used to determine whether suggested traits were activated during processing of the vignettes. One issue of interest was whether suggested traits were activated both in the context of behavior identification and in the context of inferences about actors. To distinguish between these two forms of activation, fragments of implied traits were presented either with or without the relevant actor label. It was reasoned that if a trait is linked to an actor, the actor cue should facilitate trait completion. Subjects' orienting task was also manipulated: half were asked to form impressions of the actors and half to allocate causality to the actor or to the situation. Trait priming proved to be common for subjects instructed to form impressions of actors, even in conditions that did not elicit dispositiona' inferences. Actor cues were effective in aiding trait completion for these subjects, but only when covariation information implied a person attribution. There was no evidence of trait priming following the causal allocation task In the context of Trope's distinction between behavior identification and dispositional inference, it is argued that these results show that trait concepts are involved in the identification of behavior independently from their involvement in dispositonal inferences.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. T. Crawford, J. J. Skowronski, C. Stiff, and C. R. Scherer Interfering With Inferential, But Not Associative, Processes Underlying Spontaneous Trait Inference Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2007; 33(5): 677 - 690. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-P. Leyens and O. Corneille Asch's Social Psychology: Not as Social as You May Think Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 1999; 3(4): 345 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Van Overwalle, T. Drenth, and G. Marsman Spontaneous Trait Inferences: Are They Linked to the Actor or to the Action? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1999; 25(4): 450 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Newman and J. S. Uleman When are You What You Did? Behavior Identification and Dispositional Inference in Person Memory, Attribution, and Social Judgment Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1993; 19(5): 513 - 525. [Abstract]

				G. D. Reeder Trait-Behavior Relations and Dispositional Inference Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1993; 19(5): 586 - 593. [Abstract]

				J. N. Bassili Procedural Efficiency and the Spontaneity of Trait Inference Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1993; 19(2): 200 - 205. [Abstract]