Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fishbein, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lange, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fishbein, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lange, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 2, 189-199 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290162001
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Effects of Crossing the Midpoint on Belief Change

A Replication and Extension

Martin Fishbein

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Rense Lange

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Previous research has shown that persuasive communications lead to less change if the positions of the source and receiver of a persuasive communication fall on different sides of the midpoint of a response dimension than if these positions fall on the same side of the midpoint. Using an interactive computer system, a task was designed to replicate and extend these findings while overcoming some of the methodological shortcomings of earlier studies. Specifically, the task allows independent manipulation of both the initial position of the receiver and the position advocated by the source. Consistent with earlier findings, crossing the midpoint resulted in less acceptance and change when the midpoint was made salient and the qualitative differences between the positions of the source and receiver were made explicit. Perhaps more important, change was not inhibited when the midpoint was not made salient and the qualitative differences were left implicit.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?