Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gleicher, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gleicher, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 2, 284-295 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290162009
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of Affect

Faith Gleicher

Ohio State University

Kathryn A. Kost

Ohio State University

Sara M. Baker

Ohio State University

Alan J. Strathman

Ohio State University

Steven A. Richman

Ohio State University

Steven J. Sherman

Ohio State University

The role of counterfactuals in judgments of affective reactions to outcomes was examined. Subjects read about individuals who experienced gains or losses as a result of either deciding to take action and make a change or deciding not to take any new action. In addition, the salience of the counterfactual alternative was manipulated. Past results were replicated in the case of negative outcomes: Individuals who lost money on the basis of action were judged as feeling worse than those who lost money on the basis of inaction. This occurred under both high and low salience of the counterfactual. With positive consequences, however, exaggerated affect for outcomes associated with action rather than inaction occurred only when the counterfactual alternative was made highly salient. Implications for the construction and use of counterfactuals are discussed, and a process model is developed on the basis of the data and the proposed conceptualization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
K. Epstude and N. J. Roese
The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 168 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
R. B. MacKay
`What if?': Synthesizing debates and advancing prospects of using virtual history in management and organization theory
Management & Organizational History, November 1, 2007; 2(4): 295 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
T. Gilovich, R. F. Wang, D. Regan, and S. Nishina
Regrets Of Action And Inaction Across Cultures
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 61 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
O. E. Tykocinski
I Never Had a Chance: Using Hindsight Tactics to Mitigate Disappointments
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2001; 27(3): 376 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. D. Markman and P. E. Tetlock
Accountability and Close-Call Counterfactuals: The Loser Who Nearly Won and the Winner Who Nearly Lost
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2000; 26(10): 1213 - 1224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. N. McMullen and K. D. Markman
Downward Counterfactuals and Motivation: The Wake-Up Call and the Pangloss Effect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2000; 26(5): 575 - 584.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. A. Nasco and K. L. Marsh
Gaining Control through Counterfactual Thinking
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 1999; 25(5): 557 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. B. Pham and S. E. Taylor
From Thought to Action: Effects of Process-Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1999; 25(2): 250 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Zeelenberg, J. van der Pligt, and A. S. R. Manstead
Undoing Regret on Dutch Television: Apologizing for Interpersonal Regrets Involving Actions or Inactions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1998; 24(10): 1113 - 1119.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. J. Roese and S. D. Maniar
Perceptions of Purple: Counterfactual and Hindsight Judgments at Northwestern Wildcats Football Games
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1997; 23(12): 1245 - 1253.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Sanna
Self-Efficacy and Counterfactual Thinking: Up a Creek with and without a Paddle
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1997; 23(6): 654 - 666.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. Savitsky, V. H. Medvec, and T. Gilovich
Remembering and Regretting: The Zeigarnik Effect and the Cognitive Availability of Regrettable Actions and Inactions
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1997; 23(3): 248 - 257.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Sanna and K. J. Turley
Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1996; 22(9): 906 - 919.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. G. Davis, D. R. Lehman, R. C. Silver, C. B. Wortman, and J. H. Ellard
Self-Blame Following a Traumatic Event: The Role of Perceived Avoidability
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1996; 22(6): 557 - 567.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. A. Brown
The Monty Hall Dilemma Donald Granberg
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1995; 21(7): 711 - 723.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. J. Roese and J. M. Olson
Outcome Controllability and Counterfactual Thinking
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1995; 21(6): 620 - 628.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. G. Davis, D. R. Lehman, C. B. Wortman, R. C. Silver, and S. C. Thompson
The Undoing of Traumatic Life Events
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1995; 21(2): 109 - 124.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. Gilovich, V. H. Medvec, and S. Chen
Commission, Omission, and Dissonance Reduction: Coping with Regret in the "Monty Hall" Problem
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1995; 21(2): 182 - 190.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. J. Roese and J. M. Olson
The Structure of Counterfactual Thought
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1993; 19(3): 312 - 319.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. N. Macrae and A. B. Milne
A Curry for Your Thoughts: Empathic Effects on Counterfactual Thinking
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1992; 18(5): 625 - 630.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. N. MacRae
A Tale of Two Curries: Counterfactual Thinking and Accident-Related Judgments
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1992; 18(1): 84 - 87.
[Abstract]