This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Prager, I. G. Articles by Cutler, B. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Prager, I. G. Articles by Cutler, B. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Attributing Traits to Oneself and to Others

The Role of Acquaintance Level

Florida International University

Brian L. Cutler

Florida International University

Attributional explanations of trait ascription processes predict that actors are more likely to use a situational attribution when describing themselves than when describing others. It has been further hypothesized that as level of acquaintance with the other increases, so does the tendency to form situational attributions for the other. The hypothesis concerning level of acquaintance has received mixed results, perhaps because previous studies in which the hypothesis was tested have confounded situational attributions with neutral, uncertain, and ambiguous ones. Subjects in the current study rated themselves and four acquaintances (differing in level of acquaintance) on 16 traits, using a response format that allowed unconfounding of the aforementioned attributions. This more precise measure of attributional tendencies revealed a clear-cut positive relation between level of acquaintance and the tendency to use a situational attribution. The implications of these findings for current views of personality ascription are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?