Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mullen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Driskell, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mullen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Driskell, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 2, 320-330 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290162012
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Jaywalking as a Function of Model Behavior

Brian Mullen

Syracuse University

Carolyn Copper

Syracuse University

James E. Driskell

Eagle Technology, Orlando, Florida

A meta-analytic integration is reported that summarizes the effects of model behavior on pedestrian jaywalking. Results indicate that obedient models (models who do not jaywalk) produce a small but significant decrease in the frequency of pedestrian jaywalking. Disobedient models (models who jaywalk) produce a small but significant increase in the frequency of pedestrian jaywalking. Disobedient models are found to exert a greater effect than obedient models. Crowded sidewalks exaggerate the tendency for a disobedient model to increase jaywalking and undermine the tendency for an obedient model to decrease jaywalking. In addition, the status of the model influences the effect of the model on jaywalking behavior: Specifically, an obedient model is significantly more likely to produce a decrease in jaywalking when the model is of high status. However, a disobedient model is marginally less likely to produce an increase in jaywalking when the model is of high status. Finally, the influence of both obedient and disobedient models is greater in cities of larger size. Discussion considers the theoretical and practical implications of these patterns.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Mullen, P. Muellerleile, and B. Bryant
Cumulative Meta-Analysis: A Consideration of Indicators of Sufficiency and Stability
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2001; 27(11): 1450 - 1462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. Mullen, E. Salas, and N. Miner
Using Meta-Analysis to Test Theoretical Hypotheses in Social Psychology
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1991; 17(3): 258 - 264.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. E. Driskell and B. Mullen
Status, Expectations, and Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and Test of the Theory
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1990; 16(3): 541 - 553.
[Abstract]