Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bless, H.
Right arrow Articles by Strack, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bless, H.
Right arrow Articles by Strack, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 2, 331-345 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290162013
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Mood and Persuasion

A Cognitive Response Analysis

Herbert Bless

Universität Heidelberg

Gerd Bohner

Universität Heidelberg

Norbert Schwarz

Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA), Mannheim

Fritz Strack

Universität Mannheim

The impact of happy and sad moods on the processing of persuasive communications is explored. In Experiment 1, sad subjects were influenced by a counter attitudinal message only if the arguments presented were strong, not if they were weak Happy subjects, however, were equally persuaded by strong and weak arguments, unless explicitly instructed to pay attention to the content of the message. Subjects' cognitive responses revealed a parallel pattern, suggesting that the findings reflect the impact of mood on cognitive elaboration of the message. In Experiment 2, working on a distractor task during message exposure eliminated the advantage of strong over weak arguments under bad-mood conditions. Good-mood subjects were not affected by a distracting task, suggesting that they did not engage in message elaboration to begin with. It is concluded that subjects in a good mood are less likely to engage in message elaboration than subjects in a bad mood.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
J. K. Boehm and S. Lyubomirsky
Does Happiness Promote Career Success?
Journal of Career Assessment, February 1, 2008; 16(1): 101 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
W. G. Moons and D. M. Mackie
Thinking Straight While Seeing Red: The Influence of Anger on Information Processing
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2007; 33(5): 706 - 720.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Braverman
The Effect of Mood on Detection of Covariation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2005; 31(11): 1487 - 1497.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. J. Stroessner, D. M. Mackie, and V. Michalsen
Positive Mood and the Perception of Variability Within and Between Groups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2005; 8(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
A. K. Smith and R. N. Bolton
The Effect of Customers' Emotional Responses to Service Failures on Their Recovery Effort Evaluations and Satisfaction Judgments
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, January 1, 2002; 30(1): 5 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. Bohner and T. Weinerth
Negative Affect Can Increase or Decrease Message Scrutiny: The Affect Interpretation Hypothesis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2001; 27(11): 1417 - 1428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Albarracin and R. S. Wyer Jr.
Elaborative and Nonelaborative Processing of a Behavior-Related Communication
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2001; 27(6): 691 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Krauth-Gruber and F. Ric
Affect and Stereotypic Thinking: A Test of the Mood-and-General-Knowledge Model
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2000; 26(12): 1587 - 1597.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. L. Gohm and G. L. Clore
Individual Differences in Emotional Experience: Mapping Available Scales to Processes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2000; 26(6): 679 - 697.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
R. P. Bagozzi, M. Gopinath, and P. U. Nyer
The Role of Emotions in Marketing
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 1999; 27(2): 184 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. Glaser and P. Salovey
Affect in Electoral Politics
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 1998; 2(3): 156 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
V. Ottati, N. Terkildsen, and C. Hubbard
Happy Faces Elicit Heuristic Processing in a Televised Impression Formation Task: A Cognitive Tuning Account
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 1997; 23(11): 1144 - 1156.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. J. Sanna, K. J. Turley, and M. M. Mark
Expected Evaluation, Goals, and Performance Mood as Input
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1996; 22(4): 323 - 335.
[Abstract]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
L. Johnston and T. Ward
Social Cognition and Sexual Offending: A Theoretical Framework
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, January 1, 1996; 8(1): 55 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. Bless and K. Fiedler
Affective States and the Influence of Activated General Knowledge
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1995; 21(7): 766 - 778.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. R. Priester and R. E. Petty
Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1995; 21(6): 637 - 654.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
G. BOHNER and N. SCHWARZ
Mood States Influence the Production of Persuasive Arguments
Communication Research, October 1, 1993; 20(5): 696 - 722.
[Abstract]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
J. Brandtstadter, D. Wentura, and W. Greve
Adaptive Resources of the Aging Self: Outlines of an Emergent Perspective
International Journal of Behavioral Development, June 1, 1993; 16(2): 323 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]