Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by von Hippel, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by von Hippel, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 3, 430-448 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290163003
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Role of Consistency in the Judgment of Stereotype-Relevant Behaviors

James L. Hilton

The University of Michigan

William von Hippel

The University of Michigan

Two experiments examined the role that the consistency between a perceiver's stereotype and a target's behavior plays in the judgment of stereotype-relevant behaviors. In Experiment 1, consistency was varied through a manipulation of the objective properties of the behavior and its referent distribution. Ambiguous behaviors were assimilated to the stereotype when they were objectively consistent with the stereotype and were contrasted away from the stereotype when they were objectively inconsistent with the stereotype. In Experiment 2, perceived consistency was manipulated directly while objective consistency was held constant. Behaviors were identified either with members of random groups, with members of extended families, or with single individuals. Consistent with predictions, the tendency to assimilate ambiguous behaviors increased as expected consistency increased. These findings are discussed in light of recent work on contrast and assimilation and stereotyping.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
W. von Hippel, J. L. Lakin, and R. J. Shakarchi
Individual Differences in Motivated Social Cognition: The Case of Self-Serving Information Processing
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2005; 31(10): 1347 - 1357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Carpenter and P. Radhakrishnan
The Relation between Allocentrism and Perceptions of Ingroups
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2002; 28(11): 1528 - 1537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. J. Bushman and G. L. Wells
Narrative Impressions of Literature: The Availability Bias and the Corrective Properties of Meta-Analytic Approaches
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2001; 27(9): 1123 - 1130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. L. Pickett
The Effects of Entitativity Beliefs on Implicit Comparisons between Group Members
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2001; 27(5): 515 - 525.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
V. Y. Yzerbyt, A. Rogier, and S. T. Fiske
Group Entitativity and Social Attribution: On Translating Situational Constraints into Stereotypes
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1998; 24(10): 1089 - 1103.
[Abstract]