Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 3, 475-484 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290163006
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Judgments of Self-Other Similarity

Just Like Other People, Only more So

Cathy McFarland

Simon Fraser University

Dale T. Miller

Princeton University

The present research explored the possibility that the false consensus and false uniqueness effects can occur simultaneously within a single context. Specifically, it was hypothesized that individuals would overestimate the number of others who would experience the same type of emotional reaction as they did and yet believe that their reactions would be stronger than those of others. Subjects were presented with two potentially aversive situations and asked (a) to choose the situation they would least prefer to be involved in, (b) to estimate the percentage of other students who would also avoid the situation, and (c) to predict their own and the average other person's emotional reactions in that situation. Subjects overestimated the number of people who would avoid the same situation they would avoid and predicted their own emotional reactions to be stronger than those of others. Implications of the findings for coping and adjustment are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. Pronin, C. Y. Olivola, and K. A. Kennedy
Doing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2008; 34(2): 224 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
B. P. Buunk and R. J.J.M. van der Eijnden
Perceived Prevalence, Perceived Superiority, and Relationship Satisfaction: Most Relationships Are Good, but Ours is the Best
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1997; 23(3): 219 - 228.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. D. ROBINSON, J. T. JOHNSON, and S. A. SHIELDS
On the Advantages of Modesty: The Benefits of a Balanced Self-Presentation
Communication Research, October 1, 1995; 22(5): 575 - 591.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. T. Miller and D. A. Prentice
Collective Errors and Errors about the Collective
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 1994; 20(5): 541 - 550.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
L. K. Acitelli, E. Douvan, and J. Veroff
Perceptions of Conflict in the First Year of Marriage: How Important are Similarity and Understanding?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 1993; 10(1): 5 - 19.
[Abstract]