Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schlenker, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Doherty, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schlenker, B. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 3, 485-495 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290163007
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Self-Serving Interpretations of Motives

Kevin Doherty

University of Florida

Michael F. Weigold

University of Florida

Barry R. Schlenker

University of Florida

Actor-subjects performed a helpful act and later received an interpersonal evaluation that attributed either more positive motives than they originally attributed to themselves, less positive motives, or the same balance of positive and negative motives. As predicted, actors initially attributed their helpfulness primarily to positive motives (e.g., to aid the other) rather than nonpositive motives (e.g., to create a good impression), whereas observer-subjects believed positive and nonpositive motives were equally likely reasons for the conduct. Subsequent reassessments of motives were not influenced b the evaluator's feedback. However, actors sharply denigrated the validity of an evaluation that assigned them less positive motives whereas they regarded more positive and same evaluations as highly valid. Observers, in contrast, regarded all evaluations as valid to an intermediate degree. The results support the view that actors will attempt to construct and protect desired images of self through their interpretations of their motives.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
L. F. Barrett, N. L. Williams, and G. T. Fong
Defensive Verbal Behavior Assessment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2002; 28(6): 776 - 788.
[Abstract] [PDF]