Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bissonnette, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, I. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bissonnette, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bernstein, I. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 3, 554-561 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290163013
© 1990 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Artifacts Can Replicate

A Reply to Piliavin and Charng

Victor Bissonnette

The University of Texas at Arlington

Ira H. Bernstein

The University of Texas at Arlington

Consistent with Burnkrant and Page (1984), Piliavin and Charng (1988) support the view that Fenigstein, Scheier, and Buss's (1975) Self-Consciousness Scale actually measures four different traits, rather than the three traits proposed by the original authors. The current aulhors note that they ignore important statistical problems in reaching this conclusion and suggest that their factor-analytic results reflect the same problems that Bernstein, Teng, and Garbin (1986) point out in Burnkrant and Page's (1984) analysis. A simple BASIC computer program is presented that illustrates these points. The authors acknowledge a possible basis for separating "internal state awareness" and "self-reflectiveness" using other evidence, but they further note that this evidence is relatively weak. They conclude by noting a philiosophical problem in proliferating narrowly defined "miniscales. "


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?