Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laird, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Laird, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

William James and the Mechanisms of Emotional Experience

James D. Laird

Frances Hiatt School of Psychology Clark University

Charles Bresler

California School of Professional Psychology Fresno, California

William James proposed that emotional behavior is antecedent to emotional experience. The most distinctive empirical implication of James's model is that manipulations of emotional behaviors should lead to corresponding changes in self-reports of emotion. Numerous studies confirm this prediction for manipulations of facial expressions. Although the evidence is more limited, studies involving manipulations of autonomic arousal and instrumental behavior also support James's model Despite support for James's central premise that emotional behavior may be viewed as preceding emotional experience, empirical work suggests the need for refinements of James's model, particularly regarding the processes by which emotional experience is generated. The evidence is more consistent with the view that through a self-perception process individuals "construct" their emotional experience from a variety of sources, including physiological responses, expressive behavior, instrumental behavior, and contextual elements. Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting differences among individuals in the specific sources (i.e., physiological responses, contextual information) that are most critical in this construction process.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 4, 636-651 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167290164005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
R. I. Sokol and S. L. Strout
A Complete Theory of Human Emotion: The Synthesis of Language, Body, Culture and Evolution in Human Feeling
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2006; 12(1): 115 - 123.
[PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. P. Spackman
Can Machines Adequately Simulate Human Emotion?: A Test of Four Theories of Emotion
Theory Psychology, December 1, 2004; 14(6): 755 - 776.
[Abstract] [PDF]