Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DePaulo, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DePaulo, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 1, 14-24 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291171003

Effects of Importance of Success and Expectations for Success on Effectiveness at Deceiving

Bella M. DePaulo

University of Virginia

Carol Steele LeMay

University of Virginia

Jennifer A. Epstein

University of Virginia

When people are motivated to tell an effective lie, they are less successful when others can observe their nonverbal cues. It was predicted that expectations for success would moderate this motivational impairment effect, such that it would occur primarily when expectations were low. Ninety-six women who thought of themselves as very independent told two stories (one true, one fabricated) that illustrated their dependence and two that illustrated independence to an interviewer described as very trusting (high expectations for success) or very wary (low expectations). They either expected to be evaluated by the interviewer (high importance of success) or did not (low importance).Judges rated the sincerity of each story. As predicted, participants' lies were especially detectable (in relation to their truths) when it was important to the participants to succeed but they had low expectations for success.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
B. R. Schlenker, B. A. Pontari, and A. N. Christopher
Excuses and Character: Personal and Social Implications of Excuses
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2001; 5(1): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. F. Keating and K. R. Heltman
Dominance and Deception in Children and Adults: Are Leaders the Best Misleaders?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1994; 20(3): 312 - 321.
[Abstract]