Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kakihara, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kakihara, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 1, 4-13 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291171002

The Goals of Excuses and Communication Strategies Related to Causal Perceptions

Bernard Weiner

University of California, Los Angeles

Alice Figueroa-Munioz

University of California, Los Angeles

Craig Kakihara

University of California, Los Angeles

Three investigations described the contents and goals of excuses, focusing on how these goals can be reached by altering causal perceptions of the recipient of the excuse. It was found that there are three goals of public excuses that can be incorporated within an attributional analysis: to preserve the self-esteem, lessen the anger, and change the expectancies of the receiver of the excuse. These three goals are uniquely linked in attribution theory to three properties of perceived causality: respectively, causal locus, controllability, and stability. Withheld reasons for an event or outcome were internal and controllable (forgetting! negligence and intent), while substantially all communicated excuses were external, uncontrollable, and unstable (e.g., prior commitment, work/study demands). The data suggest that excuse givers follow simple rules when searching for an excuse and that there is a very parsimonious analysis of some excuse-related communications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
E. B. Ryan, S. Bieman-Copland, S. T. K. See, C. H. Ellis, and A. P. Anas
Age Excuses: Conversational Management of Memory Failures in Older Adults
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., May 1, 2002; 57(3): P256 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
A. L. BESSON, M. E. ROLOFF, and G. D. PAULSON
Preserving Face in Refusal Situations
Communication Research, April 1, 1998; 25(2): 183 - 199.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. A. SAMP and D. H. SOLOMON
Communicative Responses to Problematic Events in Close Relationships I: The Variety and Facets of Goals
Communication Research, February 1, 1998; 25(1): 66 - 95.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
V. C. SHEER and M. F. WEIGOLD
Managing Threats to Identity: The Accountability Triangle and Strategic Accounting
Communication Research, October 1, 1995; 22(5): 592 - 611.
[Abstract]