Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knight, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chao, C.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Knight, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Chao, C.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 2, 201-211 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/014616729101700213

Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Social Values Among 8- to 12-Year-Old Siblings, Friends, and Acquaintances

George P. Knight

Arizona State University

Chia-Chen Chao

University of Arizona

Developmental research has suggested that children behave differently toward siblings, friend.s, and acquaintances. This investigation compared the cooperative, competitive, and individualistic resource allocation preferences among 8- to 12-year-old siblings, friends, and acquaintances. The findings indicated more frequent cooperative and less frequent competitive preferences among siblingx and friends than among acquaintances, consistent with several sociobioiogical and social psychological predictions. In addition, verbal reports provided some support for the validity of the cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social value construct and evidence of differencial expectations of the resource allocation preferences of siblings, friends, and acquaintances. Finally, the verbal predictions of the partner's preferences do not support either the false consensus bias or the triangle effect noted in the previous research with pairs of relatively unacquainted individuals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
N. Friedland and A. Nadler
Intuitive Economists in a Social Environment: A Reexamination of the Effect of Interaction Outcomes on Interdependent Behavior
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 1999; 2(1): 79 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. K. W. de Dreu and P. A. M. van Lange
The Impact of Social Value Orientations on Negotiator Cognition and Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 1995; 21(11): 1178 - 1188.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. D. Parks
The Predictive Ability of Social Values in Resource Dilemmas and Public Goods Games
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1994; 20(4): 431 - 438.
[Abstract]