Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 3, 316-322 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291173012

Controversy and Cumulation: Meta-Analysis and Research on Interpersonal Expectancy Effects

Monica J. Harris

University of Kentucky

Meta-analysis has had a major impact on theory and research on interpersonal expectancy effects. This article describes the initial controversy surrounding expectancy effects and how meta-analysis was used to resolve it. The contribution of meta-analysis to theory on expectancy effects is then illustrated with descriptions of meta-analyses of the bases of teacher expectancies, the relationship between length of acquaintance and expectancy effects, mediation of expectancy effects, and personality moderators of expectancy effects. Future areas that could be investigated with meta-analysis are described. Lastly, the question of how research on expectancy effects has influenced the development of meta-analysis is considered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. J. Harris
Significance Tests are Not Enough: The Role of Effect-Size Estimation in Theory Corroboration
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1991; 1(3): 375 - 382.
[Abstract]