Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klein, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 4, 412-418 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291174009

Negativity Effects in Impression Formation: A Test in the Political Arena

Jill G. Klein

University of Michigan

Negative information has a stronger influence on impressions of others than positive information, a tendency known as the negativity effect. The hypothesis that this effect would characterize impressions of presidential candidates was tested using National Election Study surveys from 1984 and 1988. Respondents rated the presidential candidates on a number of personality traits. Aggregate-level analyses revealed that personality characteristics that the nation, on average, judged to represent character weaknesses were more predictive of overall evaluations and voting than characteristics judged to represent strengths. At the idiographic level, it was found that a trait was significantly more predictive when it fell below an individual's average trait rating for a candidate than when it was located above this mean. Thus, character weaknesses were more important than strengths in determining the public's evaluations of the candidate and the ultimate vote.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. Trafimow, I. K. Bromgard, K. A. Finlay, and T. Ketelaar
The Role of Affect in Determining the Attributional Weight of Immoral Behaviors
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2005; 31(7): 935 - 948.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
D. V. SHAH, R. J. FABER, and S. YOUN
Susceptibility and Severity: Perceptual Dimensions Underlying the Third-Person Effect
Communication Research, April 1, 1999; 26(2): 240 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
O. Ybarra
Misanthropic Person Memory when the Need to Self-Enhance is Absent
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 1999; 25(2): 261 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. D. Stewart
Stereotypes, Negativity Bias, and the Discussion of Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups
Small Group Research, December 1, 1998; 29(6): 643 - 668.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
E. Aragones
Negativity Effect and the Emergence of Ideologies
Journal of Theoretical Politics, April 1, 1997; 9(2): 189 - 210.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. G. Klein
Negativity in Impressions of Presidential Candidates Revisited: The 1992 Election
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 1996; 22(3): 288 - 295.
[Abstract]