Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 5, 501-506 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291175004

Self-Serving Attributions: The Role of Physiological Arousal

Jonathon D. Brown

University of Washington

Rebecca J. Rogers

Southern Methodist University

Asymmetrical attributions for success and failure are an established empirical fact, but the origins of this asymmetry are still the source of some debate. The present research examined whether physiological arousal plays a role in the generation of self-serving attributional judgments. Subjects received false feedback on an achievement-related task while their skin con-ductance levels were being monitored. Subsequently, they attributed their performance to various causal factors. Although attributions for success did not vary as a function of arousal level, self-serving attributions for failure were more apparent when arousal levels were high. These findings appear consistent with the claim that attributions for failure stem, at least in part, from motivational forces. The broader implications of the findings are considered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
W. E. Smythe
On the Psychology of 'As If'
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2005; 15(3): 283 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
R. A. Baron
"La Vie En Rose" Revisited: Contrasting Perceptions of Informal Upward Feedback Among Managers and Subordinates
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1996; 9(3): 338 - 348.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. D. Brown and K. A. Dutton
Truth and Consequences: The Costs and Benefits of Accurate Self-Knowledge
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1995; 21(12): 1288 - 1296.
[Abstract]