This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hilton, J. L. Articles by von Hippel, W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hilton, J. L. Articles by von Hippel, W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Attention Allocation and Impression Formation

University of Michigan

Jill G. Klein

University of Michigan

William von Hippel

Ohio State University

An experiment examined the attention allocation strategies that perceivers employ when they are confronted with expectancy-relevant information and the mediating roles that these strategies play in impression formation. A dichotic listening task was used to measure subjects' attention allocation strategies. Subjects monitored a control child in one ear, while in the other ear they heard a target child perform in a manner that was either initially consistent or inconsistent with their expectations. They then evaluated the target on a number of dimensions. Subjects who received initially inconsistent information from the target allocated more attention to him and became more cognitively complex in their final evaluations than subjects who received initially consistent information. Furthermore, the greater attention paid by these subjects led them to become more moderate in their evaluations of the target. The results are discussed in light of the person perception literature.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 5, 548-559 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291175010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. von Hippel, J. L. Lakin, and R. J. Shakarchi Individual Differences in Motivated Social Cognition: The Case of Self-Serving Information Processing Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2005; 31(10): 1347 - 1357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Renner Biased Reasoning: Adaptive Responses to Health Risk Feedback Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2004; 30(3): 384 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Bushman and G. L. Wells Narrative Impressions of Literature: The Availability Bias and the Corrective Properties of Meta-Analytic Approaches Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2001; 27(9): 1123 - 1130. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Levy, J. E. Plaks, Y.-y. Hong, C.-y. Chiu, and C. S. Dweck Static Versus Dynamic Theories and the Perception of Groups: Different Routes to Different Destinations Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2001; 5(2): 156 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Madon, L. Jussim, S. Keiper, J. Eccles, A. Smith, and P. Palumbo The Accuracy and Power of Sex, Social Class, and Ethnic Stereotypes: A Naturalistic Study in Person Perception Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1998; 24(12): 1304 - 1318. [Abstract]

				J. P. Forgas Strange Couples: Mood Effects on Judgments and Memory about Prototypical and Atypical Relationships Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 1995; 21(7): 747 - 765. [Abstract]