This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schopler, J. Articles by Smith, V. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schopler, J. Articles by Smith, V. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Generality of the Individual-Group Discontinuity Effect: Variations in Positivity-Negativity of Outcomes, Players' Relative Power, and Magnitude of Outcomes

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chester A. Insko

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Kenneth A. Graetz

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Stephen M. Drigotas

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Valerie A. Smith

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

In a series of previous studies the authors have shown that intergroup interactions are dramatically more competitive and less cooperative than individual interactions. This phenomenon has been termed a discontinuity effect. The basic paradigm in this research measures competition and cooperation by choices made in a prisoner's dilemma game (PDG). Although a discontinuity effect has been observed in six separate studies, these have typically used a standard format. The present three studies extend the reliability and generality of the discontinuity effect by varying, respectively, the positivity-negativity of the outcomes in the PDG matrix, the power position of the players, and the magnitude of the PDG payoff values. In each of the three studies a statistically significant discontinuity effect was observed. The meaning of these studies is discussed, along with an unexpected interaction effect among gender, matrix type, and item sequence in the second study.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 6, 612-624 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291176003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Simpson and J. F. Benenson The Potential Buffering Effects of Group Interaction on Emotional Responses to Differential Outcomes Canadian Journal of School Psychology, January 1, 2002; 17(2): 45 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. F. M. Lodewijkx, T. Wildschut, J. E.E.M. Syroit, L. Visser, and J. M. Rabbie Competition between Individuals and Groups: Do Incentives Matter?: A Group Adaptiveness Perspective Small Group Research, August 1, 1999; 30(4): 387 - 404. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. Insko, J. Schopler, K. A. Graetz, S. M. Drigotas, D. P. Currey, S. L. Smith, D. Brazil, and G. Bornstein Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1994; 38(1): 87 - 116. [Abstract]

				J. Schopler, C. A. Insko, K. A. Graetz, S. Drigotas, V. A. Smith, and K. Dahl Individual-Group Discontinuity: Further Evidence for Mediation by Fear and Greed Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 1993; 19(4): 419 - 431. [Abstract]

				C. A. Insko, J. Schopler, S. M. Drigotas, K. A. Graetz, J. Kennedy, C. Cox, and G. Bornstein The Role of Communication in Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1993; 37(1): 108 - 138. [Abstract]