Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumeister, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baumeister, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On the Stability of Variability: Retest Reliability of Metatraits

Roy F. Baumeister

Case Western Reserve University

The variance in a subject's responses to the different -items on a trait scale has been interpreted as an indication of behavioral consistency, truthfulness, and/or traitedness. The present study examined the retest stability of intritem variances on three trait scales. Interitem variance scores showed fairly high retest reliability (in the. 7 range). Shorter, more homogeneous subscales had lower retest reliability scores. Interitem variances did not moderate the stability of trait scores. These results suggest that (a) people are consistent in their degree of variability on a given dimension, (b) highly variable responding to different items on a scale may be a consistent, meaningful pattern rather than an indication of incompetent or random responding, and (c) the simple deletion of high-variance (or "untraited") subjects from a sample will not automatically improve results. Additional findings suggested a positive but weak tendency for people who responded consistently (vs. variably) to the items on one scale to respond the same way to the items on other scales.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 6, 633-639 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167291176005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
G. C. Blackhart, B. C. Nelson, M. L. Knowles, and R. F. Baumeister
Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analytic Review of 192 Studies on Social Exclusion
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2009; 13(4): 269 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. N. Beretvas, M.-A. Suizzo, J. A. Durham, and L. M. Yarnell
A Reliability Generalization Study of Scores on Rotter's and Nowicki-Strickland's Locus of Control Scales
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2008; 68(1): 97 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
T. W. Britt and J. A. Shepperd
Trait Relevance and Trait Assessment
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 1999; 3(2): 108 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]