Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacKie, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Asuncion, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MacKie, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Asuncion, A. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Outcome Biases on Counterstereotypic Inferences about Groups

Diane M. MacKie

University of California, Santa Barbara

Scott T. Allison

University of Richmond

Leila T. Worth

Pennsylvania State University

Arlene G. Asuncion

University of California, Santa Barbara

Two experiments explored the possibility that the occurrence of inferences biased by different outcomes might produce the perception that a target social group had changed, even in a counter-stereotypic direction. In Experiment 1, subjects made inferences about the conservatism of a political group based on whether the group passed a liberal measure or not. The decision rule in operation at the time of the vote on the issue was manipulated experimentally, so that the measure either passed or failed, even though the same number of group members supported the measure in each vote. When ever the measure passed, subjects saw the group as more liberal than when the measure failed, even if this change was counterstereotypic. In Experiment 2, subjects read about a sequence of performance outcomes that were either consistent or inconsistent with subjects' stereotypes of Black and Asian college students. The magnitude of the impact of outcome biases was as great for the stereotype-inconsistent inferences as for the sterotype-consistent inferences.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 1, 44-51 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292181007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. W. McHoskey and A. G. Miller
Effects of Constraint Identification, Processing Mode, Expectancies, and Intragroup Variability on Attributions toward Group Members
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1994; 20(3): 266 - 276.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. Schaller and M. O'Brien
"Intuitive Analysis of Covariance" and Group Stereotype Formation
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1992; 18(6): 776 - 785.
[Abstract]