Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berry, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berry, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 2, 237-244 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292182016
© 1992 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Effects of Disruption of Structure and Motion on Perceptions of Social Causality

Diane S. Berry

Southern Methodist University

Stephen J. Misovich

University of Connecticut

Kevin J. Kean

University of Connecticut

Reuben M. Baron

University of Connecticut

Subjects viewed and wrote free response descriptions of one of four short video displays. These displays consisted of either the classic Heider and Simmel animated film or one of three versions of the film that had been altered with a digital special effects generator In these altered versions, either (a) dynamic aspects of the original film were disrupted but structural properties preserved, (b) structural aspects of the film were disrupted but dynamic properties preserve or (c) both structural and dynamic properties of the film were disrupted. Analyses of subjects' descriptions provided evidence that perceivers' strong inclinations to describe the original display in anthropomorphic terms are largely based on the patterns of motion that characterize the film.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. E. Grahe and F. J. Bernieri
Self-Awareness of Judgment Policies of Rapport
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2002; 28(10): 1407 - 1418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
F. J. Bernieri, J. M. Davis, R. Rosenthal, and C. R. Knee
Interactional Synchrony and Rapport: Measuring Synchrony in Displays Devoid of Sound and Facial Affect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1994; 20(3): 303 - 311.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. S. Berry and S. J. Misovich
Methodological Approaches to the Study of Social Event Perception
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1994; 20(2): 139 - 152.
[Abstract]