|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Self-Evaluation and Creativity
Kate Szymanski
Adelphi University
Stephen G. Harkins
Northeastern University
Lack of evaluation potential leads to the social loafing effect, the finding that participants working together expend less effort than participants working alone. In 1988 Bartis, Szymanski and Harkins replicated this effect, showing that the lack of potential for evaluation by the experimenter led participants to generate fewer uses for a common object when they were asked to generate as many uses as possible. However, their research also demonstrated that this lack of evaluation potential facilitated creativity. Szymanski and Harkins have previously shown that the potential for self-evaluation has the same effect on loafing as experimenter evaluation. When participants can self-evaluate, the loafing effect is eliminated. In the present study, the effect of the potential for self-evaluation on creativity was tested. In a replication of the Bartis et al. study, subjects were asked either to generate as many uses as possible for a common object or to generate uses that were as creative as possible. The results demonstrated that the potential for self-evaluation undermined creativity and facilitated productivity of performance.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 3,
259-265 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0146167292183001

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. F. Rietzschel, C. K. W. De Dreu, and B. A. Nijstad
Personal Need for Structure and Creative Performance: The Moderating Influence of Fear of Invalidity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
June 1, 2007;
33(6):
855 - 866.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Priest
Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement
Psychology of Music,
January 1, 2006;
34(1):
47 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Shalley, J. Zhou, and G. R. Oldham
The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here?
Journal of Management,
December 1, 2004;
30(6):
933 - 958.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Miura and M. Hida
Synergy between Diversity and Similarity in Group-Idea Generation
Small Group Research,
October 1, 2004;
35(5):
540 - 564.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Silvia and A. G. Phillips
Self-Awareness, Self-Evaluation, and Creativity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
August 1, 2004;
30(8):
1009 - 1017.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Utman
Performance Effects of Motivational State: A Meta-Analysis
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
May 1, 1997;
1(2):
170 - 182.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P Ramocki
It is Time to Teach Creativity throughout the Marketing Curriculum
Journal of Marketing Education,
August 1, 1994;
16(2):
15 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|